McLaren Wins Appeal Over Monaco Grand Prix Penalties
McLaren have won their appeal over the chaotic Monaco Grand Prix pit-lane penalties, triggering another reshuffle of the final result from that dramatic 7 June race.
The decision strips Alpine’s Pierre Gasly of the podium he thought he had rescued on appeal. Gasly, who crossed the line third in Monte Carlo, had originally been demoted by two five-second penalties for pit-lane speeding, only to be reinstated to the rostrum when Alpine successfully challenged those sanctions.
Now the tables have turned again.
Gasly off the podium, Hadjar back on
With McLaren’s appeal upheld, Gasly loses that hard-fought third place and drops back to seventh – the position he held in the official classification before Alpine’s intervention.
Red Bull’s Isack Hadjar is restored to third, reclaiming what had briefly been his maiden Monaco podium before the first appeal turned the result upside down. McLaren’s Oscar Piastri is confirmed in fourth, another beneficiary of the latest ruling in a race that has been pored over more in the stewards’ room than on the streets of the principality.
The verdict, though, only untangles part of the mess.
Pit-lane error at the heart of the storm
At the core of the controversy sits a fundamental mistake: Formula 1’s measurement of the pit-lane length in Monaco was wrong. With the distance miscalculated, the system used to judge average speeds in the lane produced inflated figures. Drivers were deemed to have exceeded the limit when, in reality, they had not.
That error triggered a cascade of pit-lane speeding penalties, some of which then spawned further sanctions when teams and drivers failed to serve them in the prescribed manner.
Among those hit hardest was Mercedes’ George Russell. He was pushed out of the points after being penalised for not correctly serving a pit-lane speeding penalty that, under accurate measurement, should never have existed in the first place.
Questions that won’t go away
While McLaren’s success restores the podium order they argued for, the ruling stops short of fully resolving every knock-on effect from that original miscalculation. Several drivers saw their races reshaped by penalties now known to be rooted in an administrative error rather than a driving offence.
The classification has been adjusted again, the trophies have effectively changed hands once more, but the wider issue lingers: how does Formula 1 prevent a basic systems mistake from rewriting a Grand Prix after the chequered flag has fallen?






